Subscribe and never miss an entry

Some thoughts on last night

We watched.

We watched on TV. A camera perched somewhere high above the street showed us the scene at the Fanzone on Georgia Street. Wall-to-wall people. We’re glad we’re not there, we murmured.

It was game 5 of the Stanley Playoffs, in Vancouver. I was at the Hurricane Grill in Yaletown — the first bar we’d happened upon showing the game when we hopped off our Aquabus from Granville Island — and I was with a group of urban planning PhD students visiting for a colloquium hosted by profs at my program. Up until now, my investment in the hockey game had been restricted to asking, “What’s the score?” when I passed upon someone transfixed by the sight of little green-blue men scrambling on a white screen for a fast-moving speck of dust. I clapped minimally and made small talk with the other students, asking what their area of focus was and where they’d come from. I know what an icing call is, but I really have little interest in Canucks bandwagonning.

Later, we walked down the Seawall to the Chinatown night market. “Where’s the stadium?” those visiting students asked me. “Where are those crowds?”

Over there, I pointed, vaguely northeast. About … 5 or 6 blocks that way? We later meandered through the downtown eastside — I mistakenly led the group around the block in search of the new 14 Hastings bus and settled for loading them onto a 7 Dunbar instead.

I tracked the mood in the small group I was with, as it shifted over the course of evening. There was a lot of high-fiving going on for the game, of course — people passing us on foot, jubilant after a win on home ice. Parts of our group were nervous but still desiring to see, feel, experience Vancouver. Others in the group wanted to see where the action was and be on the street — the closest we’d come was walking down Abbott near GM Place, but there was ambivalence — the desire to be part of the crowd’s energy, but fear of what it might become as well.

A couple of us mentioned the 1994 riots in passing. There was a sense that we were missing something, but also uncertainty about whether it was something worth missing, or something we would regret. We settled for beers at the Alibi Room, in the basement, the game crowd having long moved on. I left the group waiting in line at the Fortune Sound Club, took my trolley bus the 20 blocks home in my quiet residential neighbourhood, and tucked myself into bed without a care in the world.


I find myself thinking about Game 5 because I had pretty much expected the same for Game 7, win or lose. Maybe a little iffiness here or there, but nothing the police wouldn’t quash in its tracks right away — we’d learned from 1994, right? And we’d shown we could deal with it, as a city, and we were confident we would do it again. Game 7 wouldn’t be different.

These thoughts made watching the actual events of Game 7 that much more startling. To learn that all the civility and positivity of the celebrations would prove to be a rouse was a huge letdown. In its place, broadcast to a city in shock, what people claimed Vancouverites were really made of. Opportunistic, violent, disrespectful displays — doing it for the lolz, mugging for the cameras, the mockery of earned fame.

I agree with everything Alexandra Samuel says in her blog post at HBR.org about what we say about citizen surveillance when we condone its use for this horrific event. I think the key insight and the harsh lesson is that while the riots were not, collectively,  our fault — we have the actual instigators to thank for that, whether they number in the hundreds or the thousands — they are our responsibility to learn from, and to make sure never happen again. All the disowning and finger-pointing in the world based on age, gender, etc. is not going to get the root of the issues and to solve it. Only deep learning and reflection will.

There is so much speculation flying around as to the cause of this. I’m in no position to add to it, but this is the best and most level-headed thing I’ve read on the topic.

I am floored by the outpouring of support for businesses, and social media has proven instrumental in helping people organize themselves into volunteer clean-up crews. I’m also amazed at the stories we are seeing coming out of people who tried to stand up to the looting, smashing crowds. I think Vancouver’s fire and police services did their best, though they were not without fault. And finally, the whole trick with technologies and norms like citizen surveillance is that we can’t just let the cat of the bag when we think we are motivated by it being right. Jonathan Zittrain has made this argument fabulously (this summary makes reference to hockey riots in Montreal in 2008). It will be deployed on us when we like it this time — if we condone its use now, who will be the one to say it is right or wrong next time?

Anyway, getting off social media now sounds like a fantastic idea.

The Crowdsourced City: at SFU City Program, and Open Gov West 2011

Some late reflections on The Crowdsourced City, which describes two things: first, it was an event at SFU Vancouver on May 10th; I then repurposed it as the departure point for an unconference I proposed and led at Open Gov West 2011 in Portland on May 14th.

CrowdSourced City: the SFU City Presentation

This event was put on by the SFU City program. Attendance at the session appeared somewhat poorly forecast by the organizers — many attendees, such as myself, were standing behind the back row of seats and sitting on steps and in aisles, pushing the limits on the fire code. I also recall being somewhat surprised by how slim the turnout was from those who I would consider to have more of a tech background than an urban planning background. I was delighted to see people like Stanley King not only listening in but commenting too — his work on inclusive and open processes for urban design are low-tech but incredibly empowering, and it’s precisely that spirit that I’d want to see tech tools infused with for the future.

This event consisted primarily of walkthroughs and presentations from the makers of three tools: CrowdFlower, Crowdbrite, and PlaceSpeak.

CrowdFlower told the story of its work collaborating with Ushahidi, Mission 4636, and a handful of other projects and initiatives to support relief efforts after the earthquake in Haiti last year. (They have a retrospective post examining this work on CrowdFlower’s blog.) I walked in having missed the first half of this presentation, but from what I can gather on their website, CrowdFlower works on mobilizing individuals to contribute effort in the form of incentivized “micro-tasks”, and have created a platform to regularly and repeatedly engaging large numbers of people in simple tasks, and to coordinate that work into a cohesive whole. Though I haven’t had any exposure with to it, offhand it sounds a little like Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Crowdbrite presented next. Crowdbrite’s CEO, Darin Dinsmore, started by declaring that public hearings are a huge problem and for almost everyone involved — they put citizens in awkward positions and waste great deal of people’s time, resulting in little if any significant progress for anyone. At one point, Darin spoke of how he did some back-of-a-napkin math on how many city staff were being paid to sit for the length of a public hearing and pointed out that thousands of dollars were going into a meeting format that hadn’t been tweaked or changed for decades. The Crowdbrite platform aims to save time by allowing the public’s feedback to be collected online, with references to what it is they are commenting on, be it a map or a plan. The key to their interface is the idea of the “virtual stickynote”, where people can submit their comments. Other users of the system can then respond to those comments, and they can also be compiled into reports. It has the potential to save huge amounts of time and resources which are currently spent on transcription and processing costs. Darin also wisely spoke that it is just a tool — and that its success is still dependent on a clear and well thought-through engagement process.

PlaceSpeak was the last up. Their public engagement platform is based on the perspective that what you say about an issue is connected to where you live. The site uses various geo-verification techniques to let you “claim” where you live and to associate that location, in a fashion accessible only to the City and not to the general public, with what one says online. Since this session, the site’s plug-in has been integrated with the TalkVancouver.com online public forum site. Out of all the tools, PlaceSpeak struck me as being most interesting in terms of there being a clearer connection to community-based activity. But I also voiced a concern, that where I live now may only scratch the surface of the places I care about. I think there’s a whole can of worms involved, which I won’t crack open here and now, but there were a few people who voiced agreement with me on this point. PlaceSpeak has also since launched a contest called Tag Your Hood.

CrowdCity: the Unconference Session at Open Gov West 2011

I was really intrigued by some of the questions I was discussing with people after the Crowdsourced City session in Vancouver, so I borrowed the title of the session and topics for an unconference session at Open Gov West in Portland, because I felt like it would be a topic of interest for people in attendance there. Despite a few bumps, I hope it was an informative session.

I was hampered by a few things at OGW 2011 which, to me, made the session not all that it could have been. One big piece was that there was no projector in the tent, which meant no hands-on look at any of the three platforms, and unfortunately I wasn’t familiar enough with the three of them to answer questions.

The bigger challenge was a bit of a weirder one, which was understanding that the audience at the SFU City session was primarily planners — people who understood the legal requirements and the functional frustrations of public consultation, and who saw that activity within a larger process. The audience at Open Gov West was looking at everything as an entirely different group. Some of them were government staff but who worked outside of planning. Some of them were from municipalities smaller (and, if David Eaves is to be believed, more agile in rolling out change) than places like Vancouver. To them, the technology was, frankly, completely uninteresting.

And I can understand that. I think the technology that is most interesting and cutting edge is always going to be 5 steps ahead of the technology that is sanctioned or has enough process around it to be comfortable for government. I also think the fact that no one had seen the technologies in question also hampered the discussion a great deal, and that was a combination of me being ill-prepared and just the nature of the particular beast that day.

The biggest lesson for me is that I’m making a nice cozy brain-niche studying the differences between how staff view public engagement in planning, and how the public views those attempts at engagement — but it’s something I need to work harder at articulating for myself, because my work in open government and public engagement in planning is bringing me in contact with different audiences who fundamentally care about different things.

The discussion in this session picked up a bit when I talked about something which really matters to me, which is the fact that all three of these tools appear — it’s early days, granted — to be built to work within what I would consider to be a traditional government procurement process. I don’t know nearly enough about RFP processes to say this is problematic, but looking at government budgets, it doesn’t seem to me that smaller places have the money to buy these kinds of technologies — their need to effectively engage their citizens online is no less pressing. What might open source models bring to this space, or affect how companies envision developing technology for government use? How do models like Code for America, or other cross-gov partnerships (like OpenPlans’ OpenTripPlanner), fit into this space? This was the conversation I personally felt was missing from the SFU City session, and which I was glad to have been able to voice (though in a limited way) at Open Gov West 2011.

Hoping to continue these kinds of conversations with those working in planning in Vancouver, on-line but hopefully off-line as well!

Conversations in Boston at APA2011 and beyond

I’ve been back in Vancouver for just about 48 hours now — enough time to get a little distance without being too far away from the conversations I had at this year’s American Planning Association conference. While I often look back and think that the event is really intense and overwhelming — especially since it has without fail coincided with the last week of classes, when I’m undoubtedly drowning in papers and deadlines — I’ve always been glad I’ve gone, because the people I meet and the conversations I have just make my brain do the happy dance. For 4 days straight. (While severely sleep deprived.)

I did want to highlight some particularly memorable and helpful conversations:

  • I met Frank Hebbert. Cool chap doing some really awesome shiznit!
  • I met Susan Bregman, editor of The Transit Wire, and we had a great time talking shop of all sorts — she’s working on some excellent research around social media and transit, and I really valued getting to hear her perspective.
  • I caught up with the APA Planning Technology Division crew both at the PlanningTech@DUSP event, and at their meeting at the conference. I threw in my two cents and heard a bit more about the ins-and-outs of engaging planners around technology. At the former, I met some other students who are working on really neat topics on planning and technology who seem to have certainly had some comparable experiences to my own in the planning academy. It was almost cathartic, actually.
  • Met some awesome Code for America folk and hung out at their booth a little bit. One of them will be speaking at Open Gov West in Portland in May, which I am helping convene as a volunteer, so that was also really neat.
  • Beers in Beantown was the sequel to last year’s unstructured panel on technology and “disruptions in planning,” but this year I got to interact at a little more depth with Jason Lally, which was great. There were people there who remembered me and who I also remembered too! I was really enthused by the ideas the panelists presented, and welcomed the chance to build on some of my own thinking and share those thoughts with the cloud. (Update [05/03/2011]: The first half of the video for this session has now been posted to the PlaceMatters Blog.)
  • As with last year, I indulged in a technology training session at the APA: this year, it was a GIS-enabled charrettes session focusing on using CommunityViz by the fine folks at Placeways. I’m quite a GIS lightweight (spatially illiterate, you might even say), but this session definitely got me dreaming of some neat possible integrations…
  • I also shared a few stories with Chris Haller (who also writes the Engaging Cities site) working the APA Twitter booth.
  • (and please don’t take offense if I haven’t mentioned you, I haven’t rifled through the stack of business cards in my bag yet either.)

Putting faces to so many avatars, websites and names was an incredible experience. Being at the end of the semester and nearing (with any luck!) the end of my degree, it’s giving me a lot of thought as to what route I see myself going down when my degree comes to a close. More academia / research? Applying for fellowships to roll up balls of project-based awesome? Working as a consultant or at a non-profit? Settling down in the local or provincial government and working for open gov from the inside (like so many other brave souls)? All have some appeal in one way or another.

This quote from an interview with Alex Steffen struck me as somewhat illustrative of my predicament:

How do we talk about those kinds of changes, making clear that they’re something to pay attention to but keeping a realistic perspective on the current landscape? What’s possible is moving really quickly, but what is reality is still largely unchanged.

Whether it’s open government data, service design, transportation data collection, social media for storytelling in planning, citizen science for community movements on sustainability…the theme of transition has been weighing heavy on my mind. That we are twisting and flexing new muscles under the cocoon of what we have always done. The security of staying inside continues to be alluring, even as the tension, the urge to stretch out, mounts. I’m excited to be part of so many cool, neat, new things, even as I bow my head to good old path dependency.

APA Conference 2011: Internships and Open Government

I’m nearing the end of my layover in Chicago in the last leg of my journey to Boston. It’s been a strenuous 24 hours or so, crossing timezones and working on assignments, but I know this will all be worth it as, in but a few hours, I will be attending PlanningTech@DUSP, and in the days after that, the American Planning Association National Conference.

I’m particularly excited because this year I have a different role than previously. Not only am I a student, but I’m also a volunteer convener for the Open Gov West conference in Portland, which means I’ve had a chance to see what kinds of topics people are wanting to talk about and the stories they want to share on their open government initiatives, as well as how these interests intersect and overlap with the goals of urban planning.

20110408-061257.jpg

As I tweeted, I will be promoting OGW’s discount rate of 10% off regular price of registration for APA2011 attendees. As a very reasonably priced, non-profit conference open to all sectors interested in how government gets things done, I highly recommend anybody with interest in the use of technology for collaboration between governments and citizens to come to the conference. More information on Open Gov West is at the conference website.

Incidentally, I must also say a word of thanks to the editors of Planning Technology Today, the APA Technology Division’s newsletter, for including a brief article I submitted about the connection of open data and planning. It picks up a lot of the major points from my presentation at Open Gov West BC while expanding upon it with a few additional examples.

Finally, I am currently searching for a summer internship to not only learn more about public engagement and transportation planning, but how groups and governments see these things meshing with online conversations, open data and open government generally.

If your work touches any (or all!) of these topics, and you are attending APA 2011 I would love to catch a moment to hear more about what you do and where you want to go in with technology in your work!

Disconnect: A toast to the #15 Bus, newly truncated

I live near Cambie Street in Vancouver. Cambie’s taken a bit of a beating for the past while. For 2 years there was a giant trench on the roadway as the Canada Line underground subway was being built using cut and cover methods; many family-owned businesses ceased to be during those fiscally trying times, as customers stayed away from the 10-block strip construction zone. Shortly before construction on the tunnel started, the #15 bus, which runs the North-South length of Vancouver from Marine Drive by the banks of the Fraser River through to Downtown Vancouver (then back again), was stripped of its status as a trolley bus and since then, a motley crew of older and newer diesel buses have run the route.

April 18th, the 15 enters a new phase yet again. It will be merged with the 50 Waterfront Station bus at Olympic Line station, and will no longer run across the Cambie Street bridge. Read More »

This Blog is for Tracking the Flux

It doesn’t seem like it much from the amount of writing that makes it out of Draft to Published, but I think about this blog a lot. I think about the blogs I read, by people I respect, the things I want to write on it, and what it is that stops me from writing here on my own blog, which sees slightly fewer regular updates than my Tumblr. An interesting observation, in light of the theory that Twitter has helped revive the long-form essay.

Who I’m inspired by right now is Matt Webb, because he identified earlier this year that he was not blogging, and therefore writing, as much as he wanted to, and he’s been going whole-hog on changing that since then. I don’t always get to his posts in a timely fashion, but between the Kindle, the iPhone, and the Google Reader, some of my best weekend afternoons are spent catching up.

I’ve endeavoured to feel safe to speak in my own space of this blog; up until this point I have failed. I have lamented the naivete of some of the posts I’ve written here. I’ve been nervous that speaking with my true voice has cost my job opportunities with people and groups doing work I’d really like to help with. I’ve also become scared to the core that my blogging voice has infected and irreversibly damaged whatever it is I use for my academic writing, leaving the latter soaked under hailstorms of red ink from my profs, ever generous in their feedback to help me do better (and upholding the standards befitting a master’s program).

There was a dark period of time where all I could see, in fact, were people being nice to me with an agenda in their hands, intending to make off with my ideas and asking me for help with their well-funded projects, even as I was finding it challenging it just to scrape rent together, and despairing that this would always be the case. That road is still possible — either that I become that jaded and focused only on loss, or that I leave my economic sustainability completely vulnerable that way in some well-placed but misguided desire to generous.

Watching Sarah Kay’s TED Talk this morning has been a revelation. Most of all, it reminded me that I do know things, and that it might even be less important to be right than to understand the deeper insights that come from being wrong.

That’s what I need this blog to be, more than anything else — not just a showcase of me trying and succeeding, but a home to the painstaking process of unpacking those times I tried and failed. That’s the place where the craft matures. Or at least it is for me — even if others find it completely easy and are capable of having things spring forth fully-formed from their mind, that’s not where I am, and that’s a fact, not a problem.

If I’m cursed to be Canada’s Sarah Baskerville, the blogger in the UK who had her blog and Twitter dissected by the Daily Mail and painted as a loose cannon and a problem for the government — maybe that’s better than the cowering in the corner afraid to speak, as I sometimes feel I am now (save for the few other places I’m given permission. Like this mostly-mine post on wayfinding kiosks at the Vancouver Public Space Network I banged out on a whim last week. Personally satisfying (and, OK, a little indulgent) and prompted some great questions.

This is not solved yet and, for all I know, might never be; but this post stands here as a commitment to continue working to get this solved both personally and with any organization I give my time to; to find others who have figured it out; and maybe even to share any answers I get.

Accountability is both social and personal

What do school group projects, volunteer projects, and ongoing campaign coordination have in common? They all involve working with people where the rules are slightly different than the standard work situation. It’s one thing to think about the psychology of a group when everyone gets a paycheque; it’s quite another when the common ground is highly precarious, mutable and constantly shifting, and people assume their highest priorities are anything but t the volunteer work — and while that’s a legitimate decision, it’s one people don’t like to make explicit.

People can and do use social commitments as a form of accountability. I am more likely to do work in an expeditious manner if I know I will be meeting someone, in person, who is counting on mme having done my work. It’s a bit of a cheat, perhaps, but most people won’t question it if the work gets done.

But there are also occasions where the excuse of the meeting has failed in motivating someone to do the work. I’ve been here and guilty of this. But when time is stretched across so many projects and meetings and schedules are so tight packed, it is vital to understand that if the work hasn’t been done, then meeting is not working. Meeting is only working if you are coordinating work that you are doing outside the meeting.

Sometimes I lose sight of this and sometimes I think others I work with have lost sight of this. In either case, it’s worth underscoring, remember, and keeping close to heart, and I think it explains not only the missteps of others but also my own.

Upcoming Unconferences: Greenest City Camp, Transportation Camps, and Planning Technology Conference

I’m literally on the path I’m on today in no small part because of unconferences. There are three coming up (well, technically three — one local, three less so) that I will be either attending or following remotely that I’m deeply excited about:

  • The City of Vancouver’s Greenest City Camp is taking this place this coming Saturday, March 5th at the SFU Work Centre for Dialogue in Downtown Vancouver. It is the City’s final Greenest City event as they wrap up consultation on the second phase of the plan before the City starts to focus on implementing work to achieve the sustainability targets that the City of Vancouver has officially adopted. I was kindly invited to be part of the awesome convenor team assisting in the finishing touches on the event; I was happy to be able to contribute some semi-precious gems from my own turns at helping to pull together unconferences, and some dear friends of mine who have accompanied me on that journey are the ones steering this particular event. I’ll be attending on Saturday, so if you are planning on being there too, come say hi!
  • Open Plans is hosting TransportationCamps in New York and San Francisco — the latter this coming Saturday and Sunday. As I tweeted when they first announced the event, TransportationCamp and TransitCamp are bruthas from the same mutha when it comes to harnessing the energy and interest in technology for improving urban mobility and accessibility. All told, this is the Bay Area’s third Transportation-themed BarCamp-style event. I’m in awe of Open Plans’ work with Streetfilms, and sad that I won’t be able to make it, but look forward to following from afar and hope attendees tweet and take notes aplenty!
  • This one’s a little further afield, but I’m planning to attend: on April 8th, just prior to the American Planning Association’s annual conference in Boston, the Planning Technology Conference (with an Ideas unconference component) will be taking place. I met some members of the organizing committee at last year’s conference. The schedule for this event was just announced and posted.

I was asked at our last convenor’s meeting if I would submit a presentation proposal to Greenest City Camp. I said that I wanted to but that I wasn’t really sure. I couldn’t really put my finger on it — you’d expect, given my history and previous activities, that I’d be jumping at the chance. What could be it? Unconference fatigue? Too long spent in the academy (ha!)?

Upon further reflection I realize that my approach to an unconference at this time and place, on a topic which I’ve been putting so much effort into, is, by necessity, fundamentally coming from a very different place than from when I first started doing unconferences. I haven’t quite reconciled it. I feel like there’s a strange sense of being responsible with the experience/”expertise” I’ve gained. No one is asking the experts to blunt our expertise in order to make room for the voices, interests and participation of others, but because I am privileged (at least for now; who knows what tomorrow will bring) to be working on a daily basis on these issues, I feel like this would be a time to listen.

Except in some ways it’s still not — I may be in the process of developing expertise, but I lack the power that requires me to be held as accountable for it as I seem to be holding myself to that I need to take the very back seat on this. I am perhaps in the position to be thinking harder about the stickiest problems as a result of that privilege, and that awareness is what I can bring to the room. Frankly, the most emotional part of the engagement I have with these topics, at times, is frustration at their seeming intractability. There’s a good chance I’ll feel a lot better after I finish this paper I’m writing on regionalism.

Chances are good, however, that I will propose something on the day of for the Greenest City conference this weekend. It’s just a little hard to resist. Seeing as I’m working on a term project looking at non-motorized urban goods movement, perhaps I’ll just hold the bike courier session and wait to see who comes, like I usually do.

Using the Kindle for Grad School

It’s been close to a month now that I’ve been living with my Kindle 3, and quite an interesting adventure, as (both deliberating and unintentionally) it has made me more aware than ever my reading practices, preferences and occasional inefficiencies.

My motivations for buying the Kindle? Mostly, grad school: I looked at the stack of PDFs for readings for my Transportation Analysis class and my schedule travelling between 3 campuses 5 days a week, and cringed, hard. I already hate the idea of printing mountains of readings off, and also don’t read well off backlit screens. I’ve used those reasons as handy excuses not to do my readings in the past, and it was high time to end that habit fast. I’m a little surprised that I’m the first person I know with one.

This reasoning also eliminated the iPad, which, desirable as it is, felt a little too much like my iPhone, which is distracting as all hell. I need to have hands tied a little bit when it comes to reading; if I can play Sudoku on it, it is part of the problem, not part of the solution. I also considered the Kobo, but in the end thought for the price difference that the features of the Kindle (like free 3G Internet delivery) were worth it.

My set-up to pipe reading into my Kindle so far:

  • daily Instapaper delivery, which is fed from either the Read Later bookmarklet or via the ‘Share’ button in Google Reader.
  • Using Calibre to convert whole RSS feeds into .mobi format, then getting those e-mailed to my Kindle free e-mail address. The Kindle will download documents in this queue for free when I am connected to wifi.
  • One of my profs has a habit of sending us readings by e-mail as PDF attachments. I’m trying to get into the habit of forwarding those e-mails and all their links and attachments to my free Kindle e-mail as soon as I receive them. One thing that would be really nice is to be able to download PDFs in Mobile Safari and have them attached to e-mails I send from my iPhone.

I spent the first week transferring things through the USB cable, which is nice because the Kindle mounts as any old USB storage device — a breath of fresh air after 8 months with the iPhone! — so I can update the Kindle from any computer I happen to be using, and my habits with school/work computers means that I really might easily touch 10 generic terminals in a week, so I rely on the cloud heavily.

I have not purchased anything from the Kindle store yet — and not for lack of options or desire. The Kindle Storefront model butts up against my desire to be frugal by not buying books, so I’ve been confined mostly to downloading samples of books like Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together or Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows in order to skim the table of contents and first chapter. I have access to two university libraries and they are, sadly, both completely uninvolved in my eBook reading life.

Well, that’s not completely true. I use the following workaround in order to get very shoddy-looking eBrary books into my Kindle. That process is currently dumb and the quality on the Kindle of these files is atrocious. Unfortunately one of my required readings is only available from the library this way (and one copy in reserve for ~30 students), so it’s essentially a step up from manual.

  1. Open the book in eBrary in a Java-enabled Mac, take down the ‘real’ page numbers of my readings.
  2. Click Print in the eBrary interface.
  3. Specify the page range I am able to “Print”.
  4. Click Save PDF in the Print dialogue and save the output to my hard drive.
  5. Email the PDF to the Kindle.
  6. Struggle with the zoom and orientation to make that awkward scanned images look remotely legible.

Other than some links to eBook collections from the Vancouver Public Library, which are services like Books24x7 (which as far as I know does not have anything in .mobi or .epub format; fortunately calibre has made converting the former for .mobi mostly trivial), it does not appear the libraries will be supply content to my Kindle anytime soon. Pity, that.

Other gripes? PDFs which are formatted for printing, as many PDFs for journal articles are, are a little sticky to work with. I just discovered yesterday that sending them to the Kindle e-mail rather than simply transferring via cable runs it through a .mobi parser and some articles actually came through really nicely. But for articles formatted into flowing columns, for instance, which the Kindle service can’t reflow, the noting and annotating features of the Kindle actually get broken. Notes and annotations are stored as a plain text file in the Kindle, but for those kinds of documents, strangely, anything I am able to highlight (which is often only content from the left column) gets copied to the text file without any spaces, making it functionally useless for quoting or sharing purposes.

Gripes aside, the Kindle has pretty much made the annoying paper parts of printed PDFs go away, and sloshing reading material in and out of it has been generally painless. On a more media ecology level, this is the first piece of technology I’ve ever had that feel like it won’t age, because it’s already old. The touch screens of the iPhone and iPad, using McLuhan’s terms, feel fundamentally like deeply engaging, cool media; whereas the Kindle, with its molasses slow visible e-ink refresh and 16 shades of grey, feels hot with respect for the power of the written word over the playful instantaneity of the touch screens.

I’ve hollowed out a book to act as a camo-case for the Kindle. The one annoying part is that the power button become inaccessible and I have to turn the book upside down just to get the damn thing out. This will probably be fixed with a ribbon to pull the Kindle out of its groove. It’s nice to pretend I’m not doing anything too high-tech, because the e-ink in particular can look really starting the first time you see it; and really, I just want to read.