Twitter’s model and community are amazing resources to take advantage of, but they’re more important to me as a proof of concept of the value of mobile and ubiquitous web applications. As I implied in my follow-up to John Bollwitt’s tweet, I think we need to ask some serious questions about whether we want our transit system’s information distribution and notification service reliant on a Silicon Valley-based startup with no readily discernible business plan.
About
countably infinite is the online writing space of Karen Fung, social media ponderer and student of urban & transportation planning at UBC.
-
Recent writing
- #PlannersTweet: Learning how planning and planners use(s) Twitter
- A little more about #myresearch
- Anonymity and contempt in public engagement: correlation, not causation?
- Transit Pet Peeves: One person’s contest, another person’s social inclusion setback
- Complexifiers and Simplifiers: some necessary nuance
Reactions on this site…
- Adam Fitch on Awkward as Planned: short-term pain for long-term Olympic Legacy?
- A little more about #myresearch on Twitter in Transit, take 1, at BarCamp Vancouver 2009
- Jenny Ann Fraser on Transit Pet Peeves: One person’s contest, another person’s social inclusion setback
- AG on Will the smarter city be built by love?
- Colleen Hardwick on Does pseudonymity matter for engagement in planning?